SMS Comparison Compare rates

EZ Texting vs Textmagic

Textmagic scores 6.92 out of 10 against 5.67 for EZ Texting, and is higher on features, reliability, reputation and customer service. EZ Texting is higher on value for money and compliance. At 1,000 texts a month, Textmagic charges $49 in message charges before number rental and carrier fees, and the cheapest EZ Texting plan comes to $50 with its fees in.

Alain Grossbard OAMJustin Grossbard Alain Grossbard OAM, with Justin Grossbard Updated How we rate Reader supported, we may earn a commission

Reader supported. We may earn a commission when you sign up through a link on this page, and it never changes a score. How we make money.

Compare costs at your volume

ProviderWhat appliesEstimate
EZ Texting Launch plan, 500 credits $25 + 500 extra credits $20 + Monthly telecom fee $5 $50Plan month, captured fees
Textmagic 4.90c, one rate at any volume $49Message charges

Message charges exclude number rental and carrier fees. Plan months include only captured plan fees. Number type applies to message rates, not plan eligibility. Registration, setup, inbound SMS, MMS and tax excluded. Unknown fees are not zero.

Pricing sources and read dates

EZ Texting

Reference SMS rate
Source 1, read
Gateway number rental
Not captured
Gateway carrier fees
Not captured
Monthly plans
Source 1, read
Plan number fees
Source 1, read
Plan carrier fees
Source 1, read

Textmagic

Reference SMS rate
Source 1, read
Gateway number rental
Not captured
Gateway carrier fees
Not captured

EZ Texting and Textmagic side by side

EZ Texting compared with Textmagic, with the winner on each row
What we compared EZ Texting Textmagic Verdict
Our scores
Overall score 5.67 6.92 Textmagic higher
Value for money 3 2.5 EZ Texting higher
Features 8 9 Textmagic higher
Reliability 2 3.5 Textmagic higher
Reputation 8 10 Textmagic higher
Compliance 7 6.5 EZ Texting higher
Customer service 6 10 Textmagic higher
US prices
How the rate is published By monthly plan One flat rate Different basis
Published reference rate per SMS 1.00c 4.90c EZ Texting lower
Cost of 1,000 SMS a month $50 (a month on the plan, fees in) $49 (message charges) Not comparable
Long code rental Not captured Not captured Not comparable
Toll-free number rental Not captured Not captured Not comparable
Carrier fees on top Not captured Not captured Read each
Numbers and sending
10DLC long codes Yes Yes Both
Toll-free numbers Yes Yes Both
Short codes Yes Not published Only EZ Texting states it
REST API for sending Yes Yes Both
Send to a whole list from the web app Yes Not captured Not comparable
Two-way SMS Not published Yes Only Textmagic states it
Email to SMS Not published Yes Only Textmagic states it
Trial and reputation
Free trial 14 day free trial, no credit card Free test balance on sign-up; top up when ready to send. Read each
Trustpilot 3.4 out of 5 from 257 reviews (21 September 2026) 4.7 out of 5 from 298 reviews (28 September 2026) Textmagic higher

Every row names the winner in words. Scores are out of 10 on the six equally weighted criteria; Rate, volume-band and fee read dates are listed in the pricing evidence above. Not captured means our capture holds no value for that field, which is not the same as the provider lacking it. Not published means the provider's own pages were checked and state no figure.

What each costs at your volume

A per message provider is priced by the band, top-up or number type your volume reaches, before number rental and carrier fees. A plan provider is priced by its cheapest published plan, or plan plus overage, that covers the volume, with the number and carrier fees it publishes added in: the rule the SMS marketing platforms comparison uses. The two figures are not like for like, so no winner is named.

Read the two reviews

Each review carries the scores behind this table and the dated quotes they come from: the EZ Texting review and the Textmagic review. Both are ranked with the other 43 providers: where EZ Texting and Textmagic rank among the best SMS gateway providers.

Other comparisons with EZ Texting or Textmagic: